Solaman G. Lippman entered an appearance. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that evidence of a subordinate's bias is relevant when the ultimate decision maker (Evans) was not insulated from the subordinate's (Doyle's) influence and there was evidence that Doyle was Evans' chief source of information about plaintiff's job performance.Griffin, 142 F.3d at 1312.

Such special deputy sheriffs .

shall have the same power and authority as deputy sheriffs possess within the area to which they are appointed, and in no other area.

Because Griffin did not produce any evidence contradicting the probation officer's factual summary, the district court did not err in relying on that summary to apply the four-level enhancement pursuant to USSG § 3B1.1(a). R. Evid. The magistrate judge's exclusion of testimony about Doyle's alleged bias is particularly surprising in light of the admission in evidence of Doyle's self-serving statements about his lack of discriminatory intent. The manager told Collins that petitioners were to be arrested for trespassing if they would not leave the park. In the Board of Trusts case, we were confronted with the following situation. Petitioner Griffin and others were charged in a multiple-object conspiracy.

28:0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference. See Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, 365 U. S. 715, 365 U. S. 725 (1961). at 431, 171 A.2d at 721. Shager v. Upjohn Co., 913 F.2d 398, 405 (7th Cir.1990).

Washington test applies to challenges to guilty pleas based on ineffective assistance of counsel.”); see also Gates v. State, 398 N.W.2d 558, 561–62 (Minn. 1987) (discussing the Strickland test for ineffective assistance of counsel). When Doyle testified on direct examination that he had recommended to Evans that three employees, including Griffin, be terminated, the following exchange ensued: Q.

According to Griffin, Doyle repeatedly said that women should not be working as electricians but should stay at home, "barefoot and pregnant.".

It has nothing to do with women. a number of whites and Negroes picketed the park on June 30, 1960. .

Syllabus. * Enter a valid Journal (must In short, Collins, as stated by the Maryland Court of Appeals, was "then under contract to protect and enforce .

If you are not a monthly donor, we allow five alerts and give a bonus of 10 alerts to anybody with the RECAP Extension installed.

Petitioners, who are Negroes, entered a privately owned amusement park which then had a policy of excluding Negroes. 378 U.S. 130. Hussein v. Oshkosh Motor Truck Co., 816 F.2d 348, 355 (7th Cir.

Fax: (302) 651-7701, Alice Griffin

Under these circumstances, in which Evans's dependence upon Doyle's opinion was heightened by her inability independently to assess Griffin's technical proficiency, a jury exposed to the excluded evidence of Doyle's sexism might well conclude that Doyle used Evans, in Judge Posner's phrase, "as the conduit of [his] prejudice--his cat's-paw." The warrant recited that the complaint had been made by "Collins, Deputy Sheriff." Argued October 7, 1991-Decided December 3,1991. Griffin v. Maryland, 378 U.S. 130 (1964) Griffin v. Maryland.

ANALYSIS.

No, I don't.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. PACER ($0.90), Buy on PACER ($0.10), Buy on